In many scenarios, Figma designs are exported to Zeplin because the latter offers better asset collaboration. Nevertheless, Figma seems to come out on top as far as designing and prototyping are concerned. Both are great products and both are quite versatile in what they offer as standard features. That said, both Figma and Zeplin are suitable for different sets of requirements. Most important of all is the fact that Figma is a design tool at heart, while Zeplin is more of an 'asset assembly plant' for designs. Figma vs Zeplin #4: Different User Scenarios To be fair, Zeplin does allow you to include notes in your static design, which can help the client understand various interactions. Clients can click, scroll, and do everything they would on the real app or website. On the other hand, shared Figma prototypes are interactive. In Zeplin, it's a static design that's sent to the client, who then has to figure out how the whole thing works. One important difference is in how prototypes are shared. What this does is to allow the output file to be more easily transferred to other applications based on the file types they support. Zeplin only supports SVG while Figma offers quite a few options. Figma vs Zeplin #2: Output FormatsĪnother major factor is the output formats. In Zeplin, it is merely the assets that are shared, which means it's not truly collaborative.
#ZEPLIN ALTERNATIVES FULL#
As long as they're assigned to the project as a team member, they have access to the full design and prototype. One key reason is that it allows multiple designers to access the same project and make changes. The Best Figma and Zeplin Alternativeĭifferences between Figma and Zeplin Figma vs Zeplin #1: CollaborationĪlthough both platforms claim that theirs is a collaborative environment, Figma is more so than Zeplin.
0 kommentar(er)
